Message338899
Thank you very much for creating the issue :)
> Seeing that the implicit resolution at #36256 was to keep the parser module in place
Nothing was really "decided", just that meanwhile is better not to ship a broken parser module.
> may I suggest that the diagnostics it produces be improved, so that instead of "Expected node type 305, got 11", it would raise "Expected namedexpr_test, got COLON"
Would you like to produce a PR for this? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-03-26 15:39:49 | pablogsal | set | recipients:
+ pablogsal, fdrake, brett.cannon, gregory.p.smith, benjamin.peterson, python-dev, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka, xcombelle, A. Skrobov |
2019-03-26 15:39:49 | pablogsal | set | messageid: <1553614789.68.0.518176699825.issue36440@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-03-26 15:39:49 | pablogsal | link | issue36440 messages |
2019-03-26 15:39:49 | pablogsal | create | |
|