➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author cheryl.sabella
Recipients bjonnh, carlbordum, cheryl.sabella, docs@python, rhettinger
Date 2019-03-18.12:23:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1552911814.56.0.171917061234.issue23984@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
@carlbordum, thank you for the PR, but the original PR already addresses the issues.  In a code review message on that PR (https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/1034#pullrequestreview-32006381), @rhettinger commented on the removal of the print statement in the method call, which was addressed by the creator of that PR.  PR1034 was just waiting for final review and approval.

The difference between this and the print in the classmethod example is that having to two prints in this example resulted in output of:
  >>> E.f(3)
  3
  >>> print(E.f(3))
  3
  None

whereas the classmethod example doesn't have the issue of printing `None`.

I don't think the second PR is necessary.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-03-18 12:23:34cheryl.sabellasetrecipients: + cheryl.sabella, rhettinger, docs@python, bjonnh, carlbordum
2019-03-18 12:23:34cheryl.sabellasetmessageid: <1552911814.56.0.171917061234.issue23984@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-03-18 12:23:34cheryl.sabellalinkissue23984 messages
2019-03-18 12:23:34cheryl.sabellacreate