Message 337513 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	jaraco
Recipients	jaraco, lemburg, pitrou
Date	2019-03-08.17:00:18
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1552064418.68.0.171775434915.issue35967@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
> Perhaps adding a more capable API to interface to /proc/cpuinfo would be a good idea. The core concern I want to address is that it's not possible to use any function in the platform module without invoking "uname -p", and thus it's not possible to implement "uname" in Python. No amount of supplementary interfaces will help with that.

> Perhaps adding a more capable API to interface to /proc/cpuinfo
would be a good idea.

The core concern I want to address is that it's not possible to use any function in the platform module without invoking "uname -p", and thus it's not possible to implement "uname" in Python. No amount of supplementary interfaces will help with that.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-03-08 17:00:18	jaraco	set	recipients: + jaraco, lemburg, pitrou
2019-03-08 17:00:18	jaraco	set	messageid: <1552064418.68.0.171775434915.issue35967@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-03-08 17:00:18	jaraco	link	issue35967 messages
2019-03-08 17:00:18	jaraco	create