➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author remi.lapeyre
Recipients Jess, Windson Yang, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, rbcollins, remi.lapeyre, rhettinger
Date 2019-03-08.08:55:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1552035345.3.0.596080846691.issue36230@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
@rhettinger
> It's possible to have non-sortable elements in the set, so you'll either need to sort on the repr of the elements or have a fallback

Yes, it is the repr that is used in the loop and that what's the sorting needs to be done against.


@Windson Yang
> we should compare their repr() without sort() like now.

I'm not sure to understand, can you provide more information about what you are thinking of?

Is there a reason to add 2.7, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7 to versions affected ?

As far as I can tell, this is a new feature and should only go in 3.8.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-03-08 08:55:45remi.lapeyresetrecipients: + remi.lapeyre, rhettinger, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, Windson Yang, Jess
2019-03-08 08:55:45remi.lapeyresetmessageid: <1552035345.3.0.596080846691.issue36230@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-03-08 08:55:45remi.lapeyrelinkissue36230 messages
2019-03-08 08:55:45remi.lapeyrecreate