Message337457
@rhettinger
> It's possible to have non-sortable elements in the set, so you'll either need to sort on the repr of the elements or have a fallback
Yes, it is the repr that is used in the loop and that what's the sorting needs to be done against.
@Windson Yang
> we should compare their repr() without sort() like now.
I'm not sure to understand, can you provide more information about what you are thinking of?
Is there a reason to add 2.7, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7 to versions affected ?
As far as I can tell, this is a new feature and should only go in 3.8. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-03-08 08:55:45 | remi.lapeyre | set | recipients:
+ remi.lapeyre, rhettinger, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, Windson Yang, Jess |
2019-03-08 08:55:45 | remi.lapeyre | set | messageid: <1552035345.3.0.596080846691.issue36230@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-03-08 08:55:45 | remi.lapeyre | link | issue36230 messages |
2019-03-08 08:55:45 | remi.lapeyre | create | |
|