➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author yselivanov
Recipients ethan smith, gvanrossum, levkivskyi, masthana, msullivan, yselivanov
Date 2019-02-28.05:11:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1551330697.9.0.0157283155734.issue35975@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
> And the same tokenizer trick that detects 'async def' could detect 'async for' easily.

Exactly.  I just never thought that we could support async generator expressions with the kind of hacks in tokenizer we had in 3.5-3.6.  FWIW I still believe that it's better for async & await tokens to be proper keywords, but in case we ever realize we want them to become "soft" keywords we apparently have options.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-02-28 05:11:37yselivanovsetrecipients: + yselivanov, gvanrossum, levkivskyi, ethan smith, masthana, msullivan
2019-02-28 05:11:37yselivanovsetmessageid: <1551330697.9.0.0157283155734.issue35975@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-02-28 05:11:37yselivanovlinkissue35975 messages
2019-02-28 05:11:37yselivanovcreate