This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients Windson Yang, Zahash Z, matrixise, remi.lapeyre, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2019-02-20.16:56:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1550681801.36.0.445257163732.issue36049@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
[Zahash Z] (Zahash Z)]
> If you look at the queue.PriorityQueue class, there is 
> self.queue = [ ].

We really don't want to expose the internals here.  They are subject to change and access to them is guarded by locks.

> It has not yet been decided whether to expose the content
> of the queue in its repr at all. There is no public API for 
> accessing the content of the queue without removing items 
> from the queue, and I think it is intentional.

I agree with Serhiy.

Let's close this feature request.  It doesn't make sense for queues and is at odds with their design and intended uses.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-02-20 16:56:41rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, matrixise, Windson Yang, remi.lapeyre, Zahash Z
2019-02-20 16:56:41rhettingersetmessageid: <1550681801.36.0.445257163732.issue36049@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-02-20 16:56:41rhettingerlinkissue36049 messages
2019-02-20 16:56:41rhettingercreate