Message335994
> +1 for the pow(value, -1, modulus) spelling. It should raise
> `ValueError` if `value` and `modulus` are not relatively prime.
> It would feel odd to me _not_ to extend this to
> `pow(value, n, modulus)` for all negative `n`, again
> valid only only if `value` is relatively prime to `modulus`.
I'll work up a PR using the simplest implementation. Once that's in with tests and docs, it's fair game for someone to propose algorithmic optimizations. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-02-19 18:27:48 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, steven.daprano, skrah, pablogsal, lschoe |
2019-02-19 18:27:48 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1550600868.25.0.514000814856.issue36027@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-02-19 18:27:48 | rhettinger | link | issue36027 messages |
2019-02-19 18:27:48 | rhettinger | create | |
|