Author vstinner
Recipients Anthony Sottile, Chris Billington, Ethan Smith, Ivan.Pozdeev, SilentGhost, __Vano, barry, brett.cannon, cheryl.sabella, christian.heimes, eric.smith, eric.snow, ionelmc, jaraco, mhammond, ncoghlan, pitrou, takluyver, terry.reedy, veky, vstinner
Date 2019-02-19.11:30:14
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1550575814.73.0.127450509758.issue33944@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> 3.  I realize that PEPs are needed for any change and even to define what that change might look like, but is there any value in adding PendingDeprecationWarnings for 3.8 if that's a possible action that will happen?  As I understand it, it would be easier to remove that warning later instead of delaying any actions from it.

We cannot modify Python before a PEP is approved. It's too early to see that a PEP removing support for .pth file will be approved or not. There are too many constraints and use cases.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-02-19 11:30:14vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, mhammond, barry, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, jaraco, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith, christian.heimes, ionelmc, SilentGhost, __Vano, eric.snow, takluyver, veky, Ivan.Pozdeev, Anthony Sottile, Ethan Smith, cheryl.sabella, Chris Billington
2019-02-19 11:30:14vstinnersetmessageid: <1550575814.73.0.127450509758.issue33944@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-02-19 11:30:14vstinnerlinkissue33944 messages
2019-02-19 11:30:14vstinnercreate