Author jt
Recipients jeremy.kloth, jkloth, jt, paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date 2019-02-16.16:51:05
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1550335865.58.0.816741180606.issue36010@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
So is that a no for a regular .zip release here? https://www.python.org/downloads/windows/

Don't get me wrong I'm all for options, I just don't get why there is no simple tool-less binary archive for Windows. Why are the only options different variants of installers or additional tools? Why do I need to fetch another tool just to fetch Python?

If this is the final decision then I recommend at least mentioning NuGet prominently on here: https://www.python.org/downloads/windows/ (as an alternative to the so-so regular windows installer, since while that one works well enough for a manual install, for an automated one it's just not that ideal)
History
Date User Action Args
2019-02-16 16:51:05jtsetrecipients: + jt, paul.moore, tim.golden, jkloth, jeremy.kloth, zach.ware, steve.dower
2019-02-16 16:51:05jtsetmessageid: <1550335865.58.0.816741180606.issue36010@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-02-16 16:51:05jtlinkissue36010 messages
2019-02-16 16:51:05jtcreate