Message334501
Agreed, comb sounds much better than combination. And using the name binomial would make it sound like something that would puke out whole binomial series rather than a single coefficient(maybe leave it for that in case is it decided to be useful in the future).
PR 11414 implements simple algorithm that performs slower than using a factorial definition for k>n/3.
@kellerfuchs I'd prefer if we could work on this since it's conflict free and already reflects the behavior everyone agreed upon.
Would it be better to create a separate issue for math.perm to discuss its behavior?
If the behavior of comb is satisfactory, can we start with optimizations? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-01-29 05:44:27 | FR4NKESTI3N | set | recipients:
+ FR4NKESTI3N, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, steven.daprano, serhiy.storchaka, josh.r, kellerfuchs |
2019-01-29 05:44:25 | FR4NKESTI3N | set | messageid: <1548740665.68.0.00724358702036.issue35431@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-01-29 05:44:25 | FR4NKESTI3N | link | issue35431 messages |
2019-01-29 05:44:25 | FR4NKESTI3N | create | |
|