Message333656
> FYI, I'm researching how to use vfork(), focusing on Linux, but I'll need more time to study the current state of affairs of libcs.
Using os.posix_spawn() in pure Python is a first step forward :-)
> (...) There are also additional subtle issues related to signal handling (and pthread cancellation in particular) which I need to study.
That's why vfork was an opt-in option in the first glibc implementation, whereas glibc is now able to detect when using vfork is safe or not.
> If I find vfork()-like approach feasible, I'll open a separate issue. The bonus of this approach is that it doesn't depend on a particular libc, so both glibc (including older versions) and musl could be supported.
I like it, but it seems to be *very* tricky to implement! |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-01-15 09:54:18 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, koobs, izbyshev, pablogsal, nanjekyejoannah |
2019-01-15 09:54:16 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1547546056.74.0.489361032021.issue35537@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-01-15 09:54:16 | vstinner | link | issue35537 messages |
2019-01-15 09:54:16 | vstinner | create | |
|