This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author taleinat
Recipients taleinat, terry.reedy
Date 2018-12-13.11:39:28
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1544701169.0.0.788709270274.issue35208@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Squeezer currently does take wrapping into account, i.e. it does take IDLE's "soft" line wrapping into account when counting lines. Therefore the auto-squeeze criterion of "at least X lines" does lead to auto-squeezing for any mixture of very long lines and/or many short lines.

However, there is currently a bug in the line counting mechanism which is causing it to not count long, soft-wrapped lines properly in some cases. This issue is about that bug, and the PR fixes it. Merging this fix should result in the originally intended behavior, which is similar to what Terry described in his last comment here.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-12-13 11:39:29taleinatsetrecipients: + taleinat, terry.reedy
2018-12-13 11:39:29taleinatsetmessageid: <1544701169.0.0.788709270274.issue35208@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-12-13 11:39:28taleinatlinkissue35208 messages
2018-12-13 11:39:28taleinatcreate