Author steven.daprano
Recipients Windson Yang, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, nedbat, orlnub123, pablogsal, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, terry.reedy, vstinner, xtreak
Date 2018-12-09.02:18:52
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20181209021847.GR13061@ando.pearwood.info>
In-reply-to <1544320883.49.0.788709270274.issue35105@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Any ideas? Or I will create a PR in a week without 'CPython implementation detail'

I don't think we want to give any stability guarantees for this. Perhaps 
we should explicitly state that this is not guaranteed behaviour and may 
change in the future.

I would be happy for it to be stated as an CPython implementation 
detail. If PyPy or any other implementation happen to duplicate it, 
we're not responsible for documenting that fact.

Please go ahead and make a PR.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-12-09 02:18:53steven.dapranosetrecipients: + steven.daprano, terry.reedy, vstinner, nedbat, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, serhiy.storchaka, pablogsal, Windson Yang, xtreak, orlnub123
2018-12-09 02:18:53steven.dapranolinkissue35105 messages
2018-12-09 02:18:52steven.dapranocreate