Author steven.daprano
Recipients kellerfuchs, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tim.peters
Date 2018-12-07.14:56:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20181207145634.GD13061@ando.pearwood.info>
In-reply-to <1544189856.52.0.788709270274.issue35431@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:37:36PM +0000, Mark Dickinson wrote:

> I'd personally prefer that floats not be accepted;

Agreed. We can always add support for floats later, but its hard to 
remove it if it turns out to be problematic.

We ought to require n, r (or n, k) to be non-negative ints with 0 <= r 
<= n. Extending this to negative ints or floats is probably YAGNI, but 
if somebody does need it, they can request an enhancement in the future.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-12-07 14:56:39steven.dapranosetrecipients: + steven.daprano, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, kellerfuchs
2018-12-07 14:56:39steven.dapranolinkissue35431 messages
2018-12-07 14:56:39steven.dapranocreate