Author mark.dickinson
Recipients SilentGhost, carandraug, josh.r, mark.dickinson, remi.lapeyre, rhettinger, xtreak
Date 2018-11-30.16:20:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1543594837.44.0.788709270274.issue35338@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> set.union() without constructing the set you call union on only happens to work for the set.union(a) case because `a` is already a set.

Good point. I wasn't thinking clearly about the unbound-methodness of this.

> I'm -1 on making any changes to set.union to support this misuse case.

Agreed.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-11-30 16:20:37mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, rhettinger, SilentGhost, josh.r, remi.lapeyre, xtreak, carandraug
2018-11-30 16:20:37mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1543594837.44.0.788709270274.issue35338@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-11-30 16:20:37mark.dickinsonlinkissue35338 messages
2018-11-30 16:20:37mark.dickinsoncreate