Message330802
> set.union() without constructing the set you call union on only happens to work for the set.union(a) case because `a` is already a set.
Good point. I wasn't thinking clearly about the unbound-methodness of this.
> I'm -1 on making any changes to set.union to support this misuse case.
Agreed. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-11-30 16:20:37 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, rhettinger, SilentGhost, josh.r, remi.lapeyre, xtreak, carandraug |
2018-11-30 16:20:37 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1543594837.44.0.788709270274.issue35338@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-11-30 16:20:37 | mark.dickinson | link | issue35338 messages |
2018-11-30 16:20:37 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|