This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author methane
Recipients carljm, gvanrossum, levkivskyi, methane, mwilbz, serhiy.storchaka, sir-sigurd, vstinner
Date 2018-11-20.07:57:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1542700639.44.0.788709270274.issue34995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I worried about people think we recommend it when we support it, while this is just a request from one person, not recommendation after wide discussion.

But it doesn't affect to static tools than I suspected. Tools like autocompletion should support  cached_property in normal class anyway.

And this pull request doesn't promote the cached_property support in the document.
So I don't have a strong objections for now.


Generally speaking, I don't like this type of changes.
Some people think it's improvement, but since there are no clear vision/recommendation how ABCs are used, it's just a random increasing code.
We can't maintain "preferably only one obvious way" for now, especially about ABCs.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-11-20 07:57:19methanesetrecipients: + methane, gvanrossum, vstinner, carljm, serhiy.storchaka, levkivskyi, sir-sigurd, mwilbz
2018-11-20 07:57:19methanesetmessageid: <1542700639.44.0.788709270274.issue34995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-11-20 07:57:19methanelinkissue34995 messages
2018-11-20 07:57:19methanecreate