This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Mariatta
Recipients Mariatta, docs@python, edmundselliot@gmail.com, ezio.melotti, fossilet, jcea, ktt3ja, meador.inge, ronron
Date 2018-11-13.23:44:33
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1542152673.07.0.788709270274.issue16438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm actually thinking perhaps the "see :ref:`operator-summary`" clause should be separate and under Notes below the table, as opposed to current PR:

```
All numeric types (except complex) support the following operations (for priorities of
the operations, see :ref:`operator-summary`)
```

reads oddly to me.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-11-13 23:44:33Mariattasetrecipients: + Mariatta, jcea, fossilet, ezio.melotti, meador.inge, docs@python, ktt3ja, edmundselliot@gmail.com, ronron
2018-11-13 23:44:33Mariattasetmessageid: <1542152673.07.0.788709270274.issue16438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-11-13 23:44:33Mariattalinkissue16438 messages
2018-11-13 23:44:33Mariattacreate