This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author chris.jerdonek
Recipients chris.jerdonek, jleclanche, martin.panter
Date 2018-11-05.03:10:55
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1541387456.08.0.788709270274.issue29183@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
This may or may not be the same as what you're suggesting, Martin. But is another option to make close() a no-op if it is called a second time? Otherwise, it seems we'd need to make sure that no code path can result in close() being called twice (even during exception handling, etc).
History
Date User Action Args
2018-11-05 03:10:56chris.jerdoneksetrecipients: + chris.jerdonek, martin.panter, jleclanche
2018-11-05 03:10:56chris.jerdoneksetmessageid: <1541387456.08.0.788709270274.issue29183@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-11-05 03:10:56chris.jerdoneklinkissue29183 messages
2018-11-05 03:10:55chris.jerdonekcreate