Author xtreak
Recipients danishprakash, vstinner, xtreak
Date 2018-10-07.16:47:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1538930879.59.0.545547206417.issue34812@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> From what I understand, this can be done in one of two ways. First, we could edit https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/ad73a9cf97770023665a1bb1c6390a3c99478139/Modules/main.c#L430 and not incrementing -s and -E. But I believe this would have consequences that I'm unable to think of right now, so I'd like some inputs on this. 

As in the docs for -I it implies -s and -E so removing the increment is not a good solution in my opinion and will break code. 

I don't know how this can be handled since -I sets -s and -E implicitly and _args_from_interpreted_flags just looks for the set flag. This could also get a little complex if we remove -s and -E based on -I since one might pass -I and -s. Maybe we can do an intersection of the command line arguments passes and the set bits in _args_from_interpreted_flags so that only -I remains? Victor prefers -I only and maybe has an approach to solve this?
History
Date User Action Args
2018-10-07 16:47:59xtreaksetrecipients: + xtreak, vstinner, danishprakash
2018-10-07 16:47:59xtreaksetmessageid: <1538930879.59.0.545547206417.issue34812@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-10-07 16:47:59xtreaklinkissue34812 messages
2018-10-07 16:47:59xtreakcreate