This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Mike Gleen
Recipients Mike Gleen, brett.cannon, docs@python, matrixise, xtreak
Date 2018-10-06.08:56:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAAap01JRCdYtQsQVwBn6ZhxUgHgQa4_SQAGprPEuJKZJzRucuw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1538806165.27.0.545547206417.issue34903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Thanks for the quick response. I would be happy to write a pull request for
the doc change. I've never done this before so it'll take a little while to
get my head around the process, but the "Helping with Documentation"
chapter seems good.

Mike

On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 7:09 AM Karthikeyan Singaravelan <
report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Karthikeyan Singaravelan <tir.karthi@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> In addition to %d there are also other items that support single digit
> though zero padding is mentioned with strptime as below in the context of
> strftime :
>
> >>> import datetime
> >>> datetime.datetime.strptime("1/1/2018 1:1:1", "%d/%m/%Y %I:%M:%S")
> datetime.datetime(2018, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1)
>
>
> >>> datetime.datetime.strftime(datetime.datetime(year=2018, month=1,
> day=1, hour=1, second=1, minute=1), "%d/%m/%Y %I:%M:%S")
> '01/01/2018 01:01:01'
>
> I couldn't find exact set of words that can be used to denote that zero
> padding is optional in strptime and it's returned as zero padded in
> strftime but if we are changing %d then I propose changing other items too
> with similar wording.
>
> Thanks
>
> ----------
> nosy: +xtreak
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34903>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2018-10-06 08:56:27Mike Gleensetrecipients: + Mike Gleen, brett.cannon, docs@python, matrixise, xtreak
2018-10-06 08:56:27Mike Gleenlinkissue34903 messages
2018-10-06 08:56:27Mike Gleencreate