➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jdemeyer
Recipients eric.smith, jdemeyer, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, sir-sigurd, tim.peters
Date 2018-10-04.08:27:20
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1538641640.83.0.545547206417.issue34751@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> Taking an algorithm in wide use that's already known to get a top score on SMHasher and fiddling it to make a "slight" improvement in one tiny Python test doesn't make sense to me.

What I'm doing is the most innocent change: just applying a fixed permutation on the *input* of the hash function. I'm not changing the actual hashing algorithm.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-10-04 08:27:20jdemeyersetrecipients: + jdemeyer, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, eric.smith, sir-sigurd
2018-10-04 08:27:20jdemeyersetmessageid: <1538641640.83.0.545547206417.issue34751@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-10-04 08:27:20jdemeyerlinkissue34751 messages
2018-10-04 08:27:20jdemeyercreate