Author yselivanov
Recipients ArthurGoldberg, Sergey.Kirpichev, THRlWiTi, Trip.Volpe, ajaksu2, alex, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, belopolsky, brett.cannon, diana, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ethan.furman, flox, nedbat, pgimeno, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, tshepang, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2018-10-04.00:25:52
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Having properly working coverage tooling is simply invaluable to pretty much every serious Python user.  I support Ned's idea of adding an option to disable peephole optimizer (and similar other optimization passes).  Why is this even debated?
Date User Action Args
2018-10-04 00:25:54yselivanovsetrecipients: + yselivanov, barry, brett.cannon, rhettinger, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, vstinner, ajaksu2, nedbat, eric.araujo, alex, flox, THRlWiTi, ethan.furman, tshepang, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, diana, Trip.Volpe, pgimeno, Sergey.Kirpichev, ArthurGoldberg
2018-10-04 00:25:53yselivanovsetmessageid: <>
2018-10-04 00:25:53yselivanovlinkissue2506 messages
2018-10-04 00:25:52yselivanovcreate