Author gvanrossum
Recipients barry, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, jwilk, miss-islington, njs, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, terry.reedy, xiang.zhang
Date 2018-10-01.14:34:14
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJL-K-MSQx5ZcA7yriO2SZoXoTEA5ksXBTKXpiJyXgQqYg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <20181001133350.GR19437@ando.pearwood.info>
Content
Consider moving the chaos discussion to a new issue.

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 6:33 AM Steven D'Aprano <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Steven D'Aprano <steve+python@pearwood.info> added the comment:
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:24:41PM +0000, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > Would it make sense to implement a "chaos" mode (that e.g. testing
> > tools could enable unconditionally), that disables the small integer
> > and small string caches?
>
> I'm not really sure that "chaos" is a good name for that. Contrast
> the rather restricted scope ("disable caches") with this example of
> chaos:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_Monkey
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34850>
> _______________________________________
>
-- 
--Guido (mobile)
History
Date User Action Args
2018-10-01 14:34:15gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, barry, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jwilk, steven.daprano, njs, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang, miss-islington
2018-10-01 14:34:15gvanrossumlinkissue34850 messages
2018-10-01 14:34:14gvanrossumcreate