This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jdemeyer
Recipients jdemeyer, ned.deily, rhettinger, tim.peters
Date 2018-09-21.05:54:47
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> ISTM, you're being somewhat aggressive and condescending. 

Interestingly, I felt the same with your reply, which explains my rapid reversion of your closing of the ticket. The way I see it: I pointed out a bug in tuple hashing and you just closed that, basically claiming that it's not a bug.

I still don't understand why you are closing this so quickly. To put it differently: if I can improve the hash function, removing that obvious collision, extending the tests to catch this case, while not making it slower, why shouldn't this be done?
Date User Action Args
2018-09-21 05:54:47jdemeyersetrecipients: + jdemeyer, tim.peters, rhettinger, ned.deily
2018-09-21 05:54:47jdemeyersetmessageid: <>
2018-09-21 05:54:47jdemeyerlinkissue34751 messages
2018-09-21 05:54:47jdemeyercreate