Message325538
Thanks for your response. I have opened a PR at [1] that would remove the re.escape such that the implementation matches the documentation if you decide that this is fine.
[1]: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/9358
Personally, I would go even further and always add the `(\..*)?$` suffix (instead of only `$`) to make it easier to match all modules in a package which is probably the most important use-case for the case of packages. What do you think? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-09-17 12:43:34 | coldfix | set | recipients:
+ coldfix, ncoghlan, xtreak |
2018-09-17 12:43:34 | coldfix | set | messageid: <1537188214.79.0.956365154283.issue34624@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-09-17 12:43:34 | coldfix | link | issue34624 messages |
2018-09-17 12:43:34 | coldfix | create | |
|