This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author suic
Recipients Mariatta, ammar2, berker.peksag, cheryl.sabella, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, larry, miss-islington, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, suic, terry.reedy, vstinner, xtreak
Date 2018-09-16.20:52:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
@serhiy.storchaka: IMO, the problem isn't the master/slave terminology itself but the way how the changes were introduced (no discussion) and the justification ("diversity reasons"???).

IMO this is the next level: and I can't imagine what comes next. I find this nonsensical and I'm very disappointed that this ideological nonsense is infecting Python.

IMO the core developers should make a clear statement about this (either pro or contra). Once it's made, I'll have no other choice than respect that stance and act accordingly. Saying that "there will be not more discussions" or sending people to twitter like Guido did is not a solution and it's rather damaging the Python community and its reputation. :(
Date User Action Args
2018-09-16 20:52:13suicsetrecipients: + suic, gvanrossum, rhettinger, terry.reedy, pitrou, vstinner, larry, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, steven.daprano, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka, ammar2, Mariatta, cheryl.sabella, miss-islington, xtreak
2018-09-16 20:52:13suicsetmessageid: <>
2018-09-16 20:52:13suiclinkissue34605 messages
2018-09-16 20:52:13suiccreate