Message324403
In https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/stdtypes.html#comparisons
"some types (for example, function objects) support only a degenerate notion of comparison where any two objects of that type are unequal."
We had some discussion at zulipchat already:
"more seriously: I think we can just delete that sentence. The next sentence makes clear that < and friends arne't always defined, and the sentence after that notes that == defaults to is if there's nothing better." - by Nathaniel J. Smith
IMO, I think we should also clarify the relationship between "==", "is" and "__eq__". |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-08-31 05:37:52 | Windson Yang | set | recipients:
+ Windson Yang, gvanrossum, njs, docs@python, zach.ware |
2018-08-31 05:37:52 | Windson Yang | set | messageid: <1535693872.67.0.56676864532.issue34552@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-08-31 05:37:52 | Windson Yang | link | issue34552 messages |
2018-08-31 05:37:51 | Windson Yang | create | |
|