➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2018-08-28.17:18:20
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1535476700.37.0.56676864532.issue34508@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
That's fair. Maybe we shouldn't support `for x in *a, *b:` at all then, until we've got a BDFL decision? (Because once you support it one way you can't easily change the semantics without breaking backwards compatibility.)
History
Date User Action Args
2018-08-28 17:18:20gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, benjamin.peterson, serhiy.storchaka
2018-08-28 17:18:20gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1535476700.37.0.56676864532.issue34508@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-08-28 17:18:20gvanrossumlinkissue34508 messages
2018-08-28 17:18:20gvanrossumcreate