This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2018-08-06.12:08:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1533557299.17.0.56676864532.issue34345@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
AFAIK there no purposed tests for PEP 468 and PEP 520. If making dict not preserving order, noting related to these PEPs is failed.

I think we need explicit tests for PEP 468 and PEP 520. At least in 3.6 the dict order is not guaranteed. And even in 3.7+ preserving the dict order doesn't guarantee implementing PEP 468 and PEP 520. The order can be broken in a meanwhile (for example by iterating a list of keys in the reversed order).
History
Date User Action Args
2018-08-06 12:08:19serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, eric.snow
2018-08-06 12:08:19serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1533557299.17.0.56676864532.issue34345@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-08-06 12:08:19serhiy.storchakalinkissue34345 messages
2018-08-06 12:08:19serhiy.storchakacreate