This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jstasiak
Recipients benjamin.peterson, cheryl.sabella, jayvdb, jstasiak, miss-islington, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2018-07-31.12:18:40
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Apologies for only responding now, I've not received any notifications after my original pull request had been merged. I only learned about the change being reverted from, so let me leave my two cents here:

I don't think the syntax not being valid (formally - since forever, practically - since 3.7) is good enough reason to make (lib)2to3 reject it. 2to3 is supposed to handle old syntax, isn't it? I'd argue that since it is (or was) possible to use this syntax in Python 2.x it should be handled gracefully.
Date User Action Args
2018-07-31 12:18:40jstasiaksetrecipients: + jstasiak, benjamin.peterson, serhiy.storchaka, jayvdb, cheryl.sabella, miss-islington
2018-07-31 12:18:40jstasiaksetmessageid: <>
2018-07-31 12:18:40jstasiaklinkissue27494 messages
2018-07-31 12:18:40jstasiakcreate