This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Eric.Wieser
Recipients Eric.Wieser, aerojockey, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, meador.inge, teoliphant
Date 2018-07-23.14:19:25
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> It should be fairly simple to modify the code to use a format of "B<size>" for unions, so that it at least matches the itemsize

Seems reasonable, although:

* I think it should be "<size>B" or "(<size>)B"
* I'd rather leave that for a later patch. While it would be correct, it's still not correct enough to be that useful, since ultimately the union layout is still lost. I'd prefer to focus on fixing the part of the PEPE3118 implementation that is most useful, rather than committing to fixing the whole thing all at once.
Date User Action Args
2018-07-23 14:19:25Eric.Wiesersetrecipients: + Eric.Wieser, teoliphant, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, aerojockey, meador.inge
2018-07-23 14:19:25Eric.Wiesersetmessageid: <>
2018-07-23 14:19:25Eric.Wieserlinkissue32780 messages
2018-07-23 14:19:25Eric.Wiesercreate