Author watusimoto
Recipients Bert JW Regeer, Decorater, X-Istence, berker.peksag, ned.deily, rr-, srittau, watusimoto
Date 2018-06-26.17:48:07
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1530035288.09.0.56676864532.issue27777@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I don't know if you've read the dialog on the PR (there was also some offline between Ned and myself), but the patch breaks a test when running under a fresh build of Python.  I can't reproduce it here without setting up a build system, which I haven't had time to do, and won't be able to do at leat through the end of next week.

If you can run the tests on a fresh build of Python, and confirm that they break, that would be helpful.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-06-26 17:48:08watusimotosetrecipients: + watusimoto, srittau, ned.deily, X-Istence, berker.peksag, Decorater, rr-, Bert JW Regeer
2018-06-26 17:48:08watusimotosetmessageid: <1530035288.09.0.56676864532.issue27777@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-06-26 17:48:08watusimotolinkissue27777 messages
2018-06-26 17:48:07watusimotocreate