Author pablogsal
Recipients davin, pablogsal, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, taleinat, vstinner
Date 2018-06-24.14:02:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1529848965.54.0.56676864532.issue33613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Additionally, as I commented in the PR, apart from the race condition I think the test should be modified so it fails if the warning is raised and not expected:

>The problem is that the test was silently failing when SIGINT was >being delivered as the test does not check that no warnings are >raised. Notice that the presence of a warning means that the process >died and therefore SIGINT did kill the process, which is precisely >what the test checks that does not happen.

>I think in order to check that the test works as intended without the >need to run the suite with -Wall, we need to modify the test.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-06-24 14:02:45pablogsalsetrecipients: + pablogsal, pitrou, vstinner, taleinat, serhiy.storchaka, davin
2018-06-24 14:02:45pablogsalsetmessageid: <1529848965.54.0.56676864532.issue33613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-06-24 14:02:45pablogsallinkissue33613 messages
2018-06-24 14:02:45pablogsalcreate