Message319691
I tested PR 7735:
vstinner@apu$ ./python -m test -R 0:0 test_os -m test_access
Run tests sequentially
0:00:00 load avg: 0.19 [1/1] test_os
beginning 0 repetitions
test_os leaked [] references, sum=0
test_os leaked [] memory blocks, sum=0
test_os failed
== Tests result: FAILURE ==
1 test failed:
test_os
Total duration: 63 ms
Tests result: FAILURE
vstinner@apu$ ./python -m test -R 0:1 test_os -m test_access
Run tests sequentially
0:00:00 load avg: 0.35 [1/1] test_os
beginning 1 repetitions
1
.
test_os leaked [280435] references, sum=280435
test_os leaked [91518] memory blocks, sum=91518
test_os leaked [4] file descriptors, sum=4
test_os failed
== Tests result: FAILURE ==
1 test failed:
test_os
Total duration: 95 ms
Tests result: FAILURE
vstinner@apu$ ./python -m test -R 1:0 test_os -m test_access
Run tests sequentially
0:00:00 load avg: 0.16 [1/1] test_os
beginning 1 repetitions
1
.
test_os leaked [] references, sum=0
test_os leaked [] memory blocks, sum=0
test_os failed
== Tests result: FAILURE ==
1 test failed:
test_os
Total duration: 95 ms
Tests result: FAILURE
Hum, we should require at least one run and at least one warmup: -R 1:1 should be the bare minimum.
By the way, it seems like negative numbers are currently accepted, whereas it doesn't make sense:
vstinner@apu$ ./python -m test -R 0:-2 test_list
Run tests sequentially
0:00:00 load avg: 0.31 [1/1] test_list
beginning -2 repetitions
(...)
It would fix this bug as well. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-06-15 23:17:47 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, serhiy.storchaka, pablogsal |
2018-06-15 23:17:47 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1529104667.44.0.56676864532.issue33873@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-06-15 23:17:47 | vstinner | link | issue33873 messages |
2018-06-15 23:17:47 | vstinner | create | |
|