➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author adelfino
Recipients adelfino, docs@python, rhettinger
Date 2018-06-14.03:01:28
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1528945289.28.0.947875510639.issue33726@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Yeah, I think you are right. The motivation for this PR was to not have two PEPs references in the same line, because, IMHO, it looks somewhat weird. Now, they look like:

"See also: PEP 3115 - Metaclasses in Python 3 PEP 3129 - Class Decorators"

Would a change to make it look like:

"""
See also:

PEP 3115 - Metaclasses in Python 3
PEP 3129 - Class Decorators
"""

be accepted?
History
Date User Action Args
2018-06-14 03:01:29adelfinosetrecipients: + adelfino, rhettinger, docs@python
2018-06-14 03:01:29adelfinosetmessageid: <1528945289.28.0.947875510639.issue33726@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-06-14 03:01:29adelfinolinkissue33726 messages
2018-06-14 03:01:28adelfinocreate