This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients Ramchandra Apte, abarnert, cameron, christian.heimes, cowlicks, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, josh.r, martin.panter, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, socketpair, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2018-05-19.12:47:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1526734024.33.0.682650639539.issue19251@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
While it does match Christian's original suggestion, I'm not taking the "bytes" in the issue title as literally requiring that the feature be implemented as operator support on the bytes type (implementing it on memoryview or a new view type would likely meet the expressed need just as well).

I'm also not sure why you're continuing to bring up PEP 3118 - C contiguous data is already supported in memoryview, so this shouldn't require any new data shapes support, it's mainly a question of which manipulations we decide we want to offer on viewed data.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-05-19 12:47:04ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, scoder, vstinner, christian.heimes, cameron, socketpair, Ramchandra Apte, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, abarnert, josh.r, cowlicks
2018-05-19 12:47:04ncoghlansetmessageid: <1526734024.33.0.682650639539.issue19251@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-05-19 12:47:04ncoghlanlinkissue19251 messages
2018-05-19 12:47:04ncoghlancreate