➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients Ramchandra Apte, abarnert, cameron, christian.heimes, cowlicks, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, josh.r, martin.panter, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, socketpair, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2018-05-17.16:20:57
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1526574057.18.0.682650639539.issue19251@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Thanks for the link Serhiy (I'd forgotten about the struct changes proposed in PEP 3118), but the existing struct formatting codes are fine for my purposes.

The question is whether we might be able to avoid some bytes->Python-objects->bytes cycles if there were a few more contiguous-binary-data-centric operations on bytes and/or memoryview (similar to the way the ASCII-centric operations on bytes and bytearray help to avoid bytes->text->bytes cycles).
History
Date User Action Args
2018-05-17 16:20:57ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, cameron, socketpair, Ramchandra Apte, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, abarnert, josh.r, cowlicks
2018-05-17 16:20:57ncoghlansetmessageid: <1526574057.18.0.682650639539.issue19251@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-05-17 16:20:57ncoghlanlinkissue19251 messages
2018-05-17 16:20:57ncoghlancreate