Author gvanrossum
Recipients gvanrossum, josh.r, levkivskyi, rhettinger, sproshev
Date 2018-04-23.15:04:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJKHyXa46QKabe-Lg4pj+P7HHU2Qyjuc=D5zynVaRee-oA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1524486581.79.0.682650639539.issue33315@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Could you please product a draft PR showing how that would work? It might
not be accepted right away but it would be useful to have.

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018, 05:29 Semyon Proshev <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Semyon Proshev <s-proshev@ya.ru> added the comment:
>
> I had been thinking about `__class_getitem__` when the issue were created.
>
> I suspected it's not difficult to implement and it follows PEP 560.
> So I'm +1 for `__class_item__`, quotes and postponed evaluation are also
> ok.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33315>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2018-04-23 15:04:18gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, rhettinger, josh.r, levkivskyi, sproshev
2018-04-23 15:04:18gvanrossumlinkissue33315 messages
2018-04-23 15:04:18gvanrossumcreate