Author rhettinger
Recipients Scott Eilerman, docs@python, rhettinger, tim.peters
Date 2018-03-27.00:54:26
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1522112067.98.0.467229070634.issue33114@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
>  However, let me argue my case one more time, and if you still disagree, feel free to close this.

Thank you for expressing your ideas so clearly.  However, I'm going to go with Tim's recommendation and leave the docs as is.

At this point, you already have a complete understanding of what the tool does and how to use it, so there isn't anything at stake other than a feeling a vindication for a bug that is already resolved.  Looking to the needs of other users, I think we're best off not even bringing up non-guaranteed implementation details and instead follow the example of Numpy and R.  Thanks again for the suggestion, but we'll respectfully decline this time around.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-03-27 00:54:28rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, tim.peters, docs@python, Scott Eilerman
2018-03-27 00:54:27rhettingersetmessageid: <1522112067.98.0.467229070634.issue33114@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-03-27 00:54:27rhettingerlinkissue33114 messages
2018-03-27 00:54:26rhettingercreate