This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients bbayles, dstufft, eric.araujo, ncoghlan, p-ganssle
Date 2018-03-20.10:19:51
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1521541191.74.0.467229070634.issue33069@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Donald made an interesting suggestion over on https://github.com/pypa/packaging-problems/issues/127#issuecomment-374401331, which was to have distutils stop overwriting the Author metadata with the Maintainer metadata when both are specified and instead emit a warning about an unknown keyword argument.

I'm not sure we'd want to change the behaviour of mapping Maintainer -> Author (since it's a nice way to retain credit in the code, while changing the metadata on PyPI to reflect the current metadata), but I *do* think it would be reasonable to have distutils emit a warning that metadata version 1.1 can't represent the maintainer information properly, and folks should upgrade to using setuptools instead.

Éric, your thoughts?
History
Date User Action Args
2018-03-20 10:19:51ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, eric.araujo, dstufft, p-ganssle, bbayles
2018-03-20 10:19:51ncoghlansetmessageid: <1521541191.74.0.467229070634.issue33069@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-03-20 10:19:51ncoghlanlinkissue33069 messages
2018-03-20 10:19:51ncoghlancreate