➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients miss-islington, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
Date 2018-03-13.20:15:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1520972160.02.0.467229070634.issue33041@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
PR 6110 adds tests for jumping in/out of 'async with' blocks. It isn't directly related to 'async for', but it adds helpers that will be used also in tests for 'async for'.

I'm not sure this is a correct and good way of writing such tests.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-03-13 20:16:00serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, miss-islington
2018-03-13 20:16:00serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1520972160.02.0.467229070634.issue33041@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-03-13 20:16:00serhiy.storchakalinkissue33041 messages
2018-03-13 20:15:59serhiy.storchakacreate