Author r.david.murray
Recipients Petter S, asvetlov, pdxjohnny, r.david.murray, yselivanov, zach.ware
Date 2018-03-08.00:45:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1520469915.79.0.467229070634.issue32972@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I agree with what Zach said in msg313352.  I don't see how having a separate class affects the problem of what to use to run an async def test case.  If "an AsyncTestCase should be enough" but "other frameworks will require a different test tool", why wouldn't support in TestCase for running the test under asyncio also be enough?  I'm really not seeing what a separate class buys you.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-03-08 00:45:15r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, asvetlov, zach.ware, yselivanov, pdxjohnny, Petter S
2018-03-08 00:45:15r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1520469915.79.0.467229070634.issue32972@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-03-08 00:45:15r.david.murraylinkissue32972 messages
2018-03-08 00:45:15r.david.murraycreate