Message313286
Note: Obviously, defining __index__ without defining __int__ is a little strange (it's *equivalent* to int, but can't be *coerced* to int?), so yet another fix would be addressing #20092 so it wouldn't be possible for a type to define __index__ without (implicitly) defining __int__. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-03-05 21:13:32 | josh.r | set | recipients:
+ josh.r |
2018-03-05 21:13:32 | josh.r | set | messageid: <1520284412.06.0.467229070634.issue33002@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-03-05 21:13:32 | josh.r | link | issue33002 messages |
2018-03-05 21:13:32 | josh.r | create | |
|