This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients terry.reedy
Date 2018-03-02.17:13:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1520010819.42.0.467229070634.issue32984@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
'python somefile.py' sets main.__file__ to 'somefile.py'. 'python' leaves __file__ unset.  If PYTHONSTARTUP is set to somefile.py, 'python' executes somefile.py in main with __file__ set to 'somefile.py', then unsets __file__ before the >>> prompt, as if somefile has not been executed.  Any explicit setting of __file__ in somefile is undone.

tem2.py:
print(__name__, __file__)
__file__ = 'abc.py'

> F:\dev\3x> set PYTHONSTARTUP=f:/python/a/tem2.py
> F:\dev\3x> python
...
__main__ f:/python/a/tem2.py
>>> __file__
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name '__file__' is not defined

With IDLE, when 'python -m idlelib.idle' is run with '-s' or '-r f:/python/a/tem2.py', NameError is raised for the print in tem2.py. This was reported this SO question.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49054093/cannot-use-file-when-opening-module-in-idle 

In both cases, the file is run with execfile(filename).

    def execfile(self, filename, source=None):
        "Execute an existing file"
        if source is None:
            with tokenize.open(filename) as fp:
                source = fp.read()

My guess is that wrapping the source with f"__file__ = {filename}\n" and "del __file__\n" should work.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-03-02 17:13:39terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy
2018-03-02 17:13:39terry.reedysetmessageid: <1520010819.42.0.467229070634.issue32984@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-03-02 17:13:39terry.reedylinkissue32984 messages
2018-03-02 17:13:39terry.reedycreate