➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author njs
Recipients asvetlov, giampaolo.rodola, njs, yselivanov
Date 2018-02-07.06:08:35
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1517983716.09.0.467229070634.issue32751@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
If a task refuses to be cancelled, then is waiting for it forever actually wrong? That's the same thing as happens if I do 'task.cancel(); await task', right? Currently wait_for will abandon such a task, but then it's still left running in the background indefinitely (creating a memory leak or worse).
History
Date User Action Args
2018-02-07 06:08:36njssetrecipients: + njs, giampaolo.rodola, asvetlov, yselivanov
2018-02-07 06:08:36njssetmessageid: <1517983716.09.0.467229070634.issue32751@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-02-07 06:08:36njslinkissue32751 messages
2018-02-07 06:08:35njscreate