Author martin.panter
Recipients John Jones, alex, benjamin.peterson, dhduvall, gennad, gregory.p.smith, martin.panter, neologix, pablogsal
Date 2018-01-29.11:23:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Your assumption about calling “file_actions_destroy” would be okay if the posix_spawn_file_actions_t object was a simple object or structure. But I imagine most implementations would allocate memory when you call one of the “add” methods. Especially “addopen”, which is supposed to copy the filename string somewhere. Looking at “uclibc” <>, I see it calls “free”, because it allocates an array for all the file actions.
Date User Action Args
2018-01-29 11:23:39martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, gregory.p.smith, benjamin.peterson, alex, dhduvall, neologix, gennad, John Jones, pablogsal
2018-01-29 11:23:39martin.pantersetmessageid: <>
2018-01-29 11:23:39martin.panterlinkissue20104 messages
2018-01-29 11:23:39martin.pantercreate