This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients elliot.gorokhovsky, eryksun, godaygo, mdk, ppperry, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2018-01-28.22:46:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1517179582.92.0.467229070634.issue28685@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I suggest to post-pone this optimization to Python 3.8. Faster list.sort() is nice to have, but I'm not sure that it's a killer feature that will make everybody move to Python 3.7. It can wait for 3.8.

No core dev took the lead on this non-trivial issue, and IMHO it's getting too late for 3.7.

It see that Serhiy started to review the change and asked for more benchmarks. Serhiy would be a good candidate to drive such work, but sadly he seems to be busy these days...

While such optimization is nice to have, we should be careful to not introduce a performance regressions on some cases. I read quickly the issue, and I'm not sure that it was fully carefully reviewed and tested yet. Sorry, I only read it quickly, ignore me if I'm wrong.

Well, if someone wants to take the responsability of pushing this right now, it's up to you :-)
History
Date User Action Args
2018-01-28 22:46:22vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, tim.peters, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, eryksun, ppperry, mdk, elliot.gorokhovsky, godaygo
2018-01-28 22:46:22vstinnersetmessageid: <1517179582.92.0.467229070634.issue28685@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-01-28 22:46:22vstinnerlinkissue28685 messages
2018-01-28 22:46:22vstinnercreate