This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, methane, ned.deily, skrah, yselivanov
Date 2018-01-26.21:27:21
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJJ9bVeCopP=u441Y4qUso3RUkqduZgp7Ys367brq3uu6g@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1517001700.84.0.467229070634.issue32630@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Stefan, I don't think a module author should retain veto over everything
affecting their code forever. (We've had spectacular process failures with
this in the past.) Please take a deep breath and patiently answer Yury's
questions. If you two can't agree on this, the status quo wins, but it will
be a blemish on your reputation if you just block it unilaterally. At the
very least help Yury reproduce your timing results -- at this point the
burden is on you since nobody else can reproduce them.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-01-26 21:27:22gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, ned.deily, methane, skrah, yselivanov
2018-01-26 21:27:21gvanrossumlinkissue32630 messages
2018-01-26 21:27:21gvanrossumcreate