➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients Mark.Shannon, gvanrossum, levkivskyi, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
Date 2018-01-20.07:49:50
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1516434590.8.0.467229070634.issue32550@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> This PR moves the constant for the name from `co_names` to `co_consts`. There is no duplication.

But if there is an initializer, the name is left in `co_names` too.

I don't think this (as well as possible performance difference) is important. My only concerns are about subtle behavior differences.

For example, is the name always interned (even if long or non-ASCII)? Does any code depend on interning keys in __annotations__? (There is a code that depends on interning keys in type.__dict__).
History
Date User Action Args
2018-01-20 07:49:50serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, gvanrossum, rhettinger, Mark.Shannon, yselivanov, levkivskyi
2018-01-20 07:49:50serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1516434590.8.0.467229070634.issue32550@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-01-20 07:49:50serhiy.storchakalinkissue32550 messages
2018-01-20 07:49:50serhiy.storchakacreate