Author rhettinger
Recipients benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, inada.naoki, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
Date 2018-01-03.21:03:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1515013398.34.0.467229070634.issue32477@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> This is a step to getting rid of the peepholer.

There is no goal to get rid of the peepholer optimizer.  Please don't invent this as a requirement.

If some optimization are more easily performed upstream, then go ahead and move them upstream.  The goal is to have a net reduction in complexity, not just the elimination of peephole.c just because you decided it should disappear.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-01-03 21:03:18rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, inada.naoki, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
2018-01-03 21:03:18rhettingersetmessageid: <1515013398.34.0.467229070634.issue32477@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-01-03 21:03:18rhettingerlinkissue32477 messages
2018-01-03 21:03:18rhettingercreate